PUTNAM WELLES HANGEN |
Only
later did I realize how great the strain was. Menon was already hatching plans
to seize the 1394-square-mile Portuguese enclave of Goa, on the west coast of
India. I have authentic information that Menon and Lieutenant General B. M.
Kaul, the chief of the general staff, planned to send a party of Indian border
police into Goa, some of whom would allow themselves to be captured by the
Portuguese.
The rest
were to fall back and give the alarm. Under the pretext of rescuing the
captured border guards, a small Indian force would move in and engage the
Portuguese. The main body of Indian troops would then quickly overrun Goa,
which is about the size of Rhode Island. In late November 1961 Nehru got wind
of the scheme and summoned Menon and the senior military chiefs. He rebuked
them for plotting direct action against Goa without his permission. Menon
persisted. With the help of hand-picked lieutenants like G. K. Handoo, a top
security officer, he stepped up subversion against the Portuguese in Goa. The
Indian border police under Handoo's direction recruited, trained, and equipped
saboteurs, who were slipped across the border into Goa. Fabricated stories
about Portuguese "border provocations" were fed to the Indian press.
On
December 7, 1961, Menon lent the weight of his official position to the
concoctions. He told the Lok Sabha: "Reports Have been pouring in for the
last two weeks of intensified firing activity, oppression and terrorism in Goa
and of heavy reinforcements of Portuguese armed forces.... There was a report
of 2,500 troops having been deployed along the Goa border... also a report of a
fleet of two Portuguese frigates standing guard.... 3,000 more troops from
African and other places have also arrived.... It was also reported that
dawn-to-dusk curfew had been imposed and that anyone coming after the curfew
hours would be shot at sight.... Another report said that in Daman over 1,000
Portuguese soldiers had landed.... The Portuguese armed forces are thus poised
near the border at various points to overawe and intimidate both the residents
of Goa and those living in the border villages on the Indian side. Hit-and-run
raids across the border already seem to have started. A raid in a village near
Savantvadi was reported two days ago."
There was
indeed a military build-up under way, but it was on the Indian, not the
Portuguese, side. Rail traffic throughout northern and western India had been
disrupted to move the elite 50th Paratroop Brigade and the 17th Infantry
Division to jumping-off positions near the Goa border. Elements of the First
Armored Division were also deployed. In full view of the Goan coast, India had
assembled a task force compose of the newly acquired aircraft carrier Vikrant,
two cruisers, a destroyer flotilla, at least two antisubmarine frigates, two
antiaircraft frigates, and supporting craft. Canberra jet bombers and Gnat and
Vampire fighters had been concentrated at Belgaum to support the ground and
naval units.
Contrary
to what Menon had said, no Portuguese reinforcements ever reached the 3,500-man
garrison in Goa and the two smaller enclaves in India. Against India's heavy
Centurion tanks, the Portuguese could muster only a handful of 1942- vintage
armored reconnaissance cars. They had no air force whatever. Their only warship
was the seventeen-year-old sloop Afonso de Albuquerque, which went into action
against the entire Indian armada. I know these facts firsthand because I spent
ten days covering every part of Goa before the Indians invaded, and I was there
during the take-over. My own observation leads me to credit the estimate by
foreign military attaches that India enjoyed at least a ten-to-one numerical
superiority over the hopelessly ill-equipped and outmanned Portuguese
defenders. The invasion of Goa actually began more than twenty-four hours
before India announced early on December 18, 1961, that its troops had been
ordered to move in. On Sunday morning, December 17, several other Western
correspondents and I ran into bearded Indian troops dug in at least a quarter
of a mile inside Goan territory. They had taken over the Sinquervale frontier
post, abandoned three days before by the Portuguese, who feared that its
exposed position would give the Indians an opportunity to provoke a shooting
incident.
The
Indians needed no pretext. The other correspondents and I alighted from our
taxi to walk several hundred yards to what we expected would be a Portuguese
frontier post. There was an ominous silence until we heard a voice shouting to
us in Hindi to stop. A turbaned Sikh trained his machine gun on us. We
explained that we were British and American newsmen and asked to see the
officer in charge. We were then taken into custody and held at the post for an
hour, until an Indian Army captain in paratroop uniform arrived on the scene.
He questioned us about the condition of the roads in Goa, then told us to
return to Pangim, Goa's capital, in the taxi we had brought. As we left, he
said matter-of-factly: "It's all right your coming here in daylight. But
tonight or, rather, at night we couldn't guarantee your safety." That night
the push was on.
Soon
after the invasion began, Menon called a news conference in New Delhi. He was
in a jaunty mood. India, he explained, had been "forced" to send
troops into Goa to protect the civil population against the breakdown of law
and order and the collapse of the "colonial regime." I know from my
own observation that there was no breakdown of law and order and no collapse of
the regime in Pangim or any of the many other places I saw in Goa. I had twice
visited the central prison in Pangim, and found it occupied by only eleven
bored inmates, seven of them political prisoners. There had not been a single
case of arson, looting, or terrorism in Pangim in the ten days before the
Indians invaded. There was no curfew there or anywhere else in Goa. Where isolated
acts of terrorism or sabotage had taken place, it was established that most of
them were committed by infiltrators trained and equipped by Handoo's Indian
border police. Menon had talked about the people of Goa being "shot down,
repressed, and massacred." He had said that the Goans must achieve their
own liberation. But the striking thing about Goa on the eve of the Indian
take-over was its tranquility. There was no popular resistance movement worthy
of the name. Portugal was not particularly popular, but neither was India
except among a section of Goan Hindus (mostly lawyers, teachers, and other
middle-class professionals), who hoped their status would improve under Indian
rule. They are already showing signs of disappointment.
Many of
Goa's 228,000 Christians (out of a total population of 640,000) might have
preferred to maintain some link with Portugal as insurance against being
swamped by the fast-growing Hindu majority. My own feeling is that a majority
of politically conscious Goans would have elected for autonomy or actual
independence if they had been given the choice. Ten days before Indian troops
had moved onto Goan soil, Menon told the lower house of Parliament, "The
position of the government is that there is no question of our going and liberating
Goa. The question is that we shall not leave our places undefended...." He
termed Indian troop movements "precautionary," and said flatly,
"There is no question of suddenly hitting or attacking; Government... is
not thinking of any operations."
A few
years before, Menon had publicly affirmed, "I say categorically that India
will not take one step that involves the use of force to alter a situation,
even if the legal right is on her side." Nehru had been even more
specific. Speaking of Goa in Parliament on September 17, 1955, he said,
"We rule out non-peaceful methods completely." Even a police action,
he said, would lay Indians open to the charge of being "deceitful
hypocrites." He insisted that reliance on peaceful methods to bring Goa
into India "is not only a sound policy, but the only possible
policy."
Such is
India's record on Goa. It has earned Menon the epithet of the "Goa
constrictor." I have never been able to understand why the resort to force
to seize Goa surprised so many people in America and Britain. Nehru champions
many Gandhian ideals, but pure nonviolence is not one of them. He has used
violence before in Kashmir and against the princely state of Hyderabad in 1948.
He is still using it against the Naga rebels fighting for their independence in
extreme eastern India. During the first fifteen years of independence, Indian
police have fired on Indian crowds at least as frequently as the British used
force during the last fifteen years of their rule. For his part, Menon has
never even paid lip service to Gandhianism. He calls it "good
merchandise" but boasts that he does not need it. For me, the most
significant thing about the Goa operation is the light it sheds on Menon's
power at that time to manipulate Nehru and the rest of the Indian government
for his own ends. To what extent Nehru believed Menon's fraudulent version of
events leading up to the take-over is difficult to say at this stage. The Prime
Minister was under heavy pressure from the Army and public opinion on the eve
of the 1962 elections to demonstrate that he could deal firmly with foreign
intruders. No action being possible (in Nehru's judgment) against the Chinese,
he may have felt compelled to move on Goa. I have never accepted the notion
that Goa was primarily designed to enhance Menon's electoral prospects in North
Bombay. Menon was convinced he could win without Goa because he had Nehru and
the Congress machine working for him.
The North
Bombay campaign in the fall and winter of 1961-1962 was the most bitterly
contested and lavishly financed election in Indian history. It aroused strong
passions in India and abroad. Its outcome, although never really in doubt, was
thought likely to affect the future of India and Asia for many years to come.
North Bombay is what is known in India as a "prestige constituency."
Its 762,775 eligible voters, living in an area of 254 square miles, include
many Bombay cinema artists, writers, and professional people. But the majority
is composed of illiterate slum dwellers, poor artisans, petty traders, and
manual laborers. Tiny stall shops and thatch huts sprawl over the tidal marsh
land of North Bombay. The constituency has been solidly Congress for many
years. In 1957 Menon was elected from there without difficulty, although the
local tide was running against the Congress party at the time.
When
Menon sought renomination from North Bombay in 1961, he met surprising
opposition. The District Congress Committee voted by a narrow margin to choose
an old school party stalwart over Menon. Nehru was furious and demanded that
Menon run from North Bombay. Local party leaders finally bowed to the Prime
Minister, but twenty-six members of the Congress party youth organization
resigned and declared in a statement, "We are convinced Menon is pro-Communist
and the future of the country is not safe in his hands as India's defense
minister and spokesman of our foreign policy.... We feel it is our bounden duty
to see that he is defeated." Nehru later told 200,000 people in Bombay
that the defectors could "go to hell." At the end of his speech, he
turned to Menon, sitting behind him, to ask, "Is that all you wanted me to
say?"
Menon was
opposed by the perennial maverick of Indian politics, seventy-four-year-old
Jiwatram Bhagwandas Kripalani, who carries the honorific title of Acharya
(teacher) and once served as president of the Congress Party. He resigned from
the Congress in 1951 in a dispute with Nehru, formed his own party, and finally
became an independent. In North Bombay he was backed by an unlikely coalition
of the Praja Socialist Party, the traditionalist Hindu Jan Sangh, and the Right
Wing conservative Swatantra Party. As a long-time associate of Gandhi and
friend of Nehru, Kripalani was loath to attack Congress or Nehru. He
concentrated his fire on Menon, whom he called "the spearhead of the
creeping march of Communism in the country and in the Congress." He
insisted that it was dangerous to entrust the defense of the country against
Communist China to such a man. This issue, however well chosen, evoked little
response among the largely illiterate masses of North Bombay. Kripalani's own
supporters were often at odds. His campaign was badly organized.
Menon, on
the other hand, rode to victory on the well-oiled machines of Congress and the
Communists, with a powerful assist from Nehru. Congress and Communist party
workers carried on door-to-door campaigning for him in every ward of the
constituency. The movie colony, attracted by Menon's radicalism and flattered
by his attentions, was mobilized. A. M. Tariq, a Moslem member of Parliament
and former tonga driver from Kashmir, was imported to rally North Bombay's
80,000 Moslems. Mrs. Violet Alva, a south Indian Christian, who was then deputy
home minister, appealed to the 50,000 Christians (mostly Goans). Even Bombay's
powerful bootleggers were told to muster their supporters. But by far the most
effective support for Menon came from Nehru. Driving himself at an inhuman
pace, Nehru toured India from Kashmir to Kerala defending Menon at every turn.
He campaigned in North Bombay a month before the elections and offered to
return in the last days, but the Congress party bosses assured him that Menon's
victory was already safe. Nehru's theme was: "A vote against Menon is a
vote against me." He even threatened to resign if the Defense Minister
were defeated.
While
Menon remained silent in the face of charges that he was a crypto-Communist,
Nehru heatedly denied them, insisting, "Mr. Menon is a socialist like me.
But he is a real socialist and not an armchair socialist."
Overexertion
during the campaign contributed to the illness that incapacitated Nehru for
several weeks in April.
PUTNAM WELLES HANGEN
: Putnam Welles Hangen was a member of the Brown University
class of 1949, joined the New York Times in 1950 as a correspondent in the
Paris bureau. In 1953, at the age of 23, he established a bureau in Ankara,
becoming the Times' reporter in Turkey, then moved to Moscow. He resigned from
the Times and made the move to television in 1956, taking over NBC's Cairo
bureau. NBC sent him to New Delhi in 1960, to Germany in 1964, and finally to
Hong Kong as bureau chief.
Hangen
was last seen alive on May 30, 1970, when he and his NBC crew were traveling
with a crew from CBS about 25 miles south of Phnom Penh. Three miles after
passing its last checkpoint, the group was attacked, and the CBS reporter and
crew were killed. Hangen and his NBC crew were surrounded and led away; they
were executed three days later.
For the
first few years after Hangen disappeared, fellow journalists continued to
investigate. Hangen’s wife, Pat, began writing and speaking about journalists
who were missing in Cambodia and Vietnam, and continued to press for a
resolution.
War and
political upheaval in Cambodia kept searchers away until 1991, when an NBC crew
returned. In 1992, a team of U.S. Army technicians visited the site and found
remains that DNA testing confirmed were those of Hangen. In January 1993, 23
years after he disappeared, Welles Hangen was laid to rest with a 21-gun salute
at the Arlington National Cemetery. His papers, notes, scripts, tapes, and
films are now part of the permanent collection of the Museum of Radio and
Television in New York City, given by NBC in 1978.
Also in
1993, Brown University's President Vartan Gregorian established the Welles
Hangen Award to honor journalists for distinguished service.
Um artigo apropriado para recordar o passado e informar sobre o contexto em que se deu a queda do Estado da India.
ReplyDelete